🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and fit for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the regional government level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.